Apple is reportedly planning to launch a new, more expensive version of its flagship iPhone, according to a recent report from Bloomberg. The report suggests that this new version will be distinct from the existing Pro and Pro Max models and could be called iPhone Ultra, iPhone Supreme, or iPhone flexible.
Apple rumored to launch iPhone Ultra at premium price
While no official details have been released, the iPhone Ultra is expected to start at a price that is at least $100 more than the next model in the product stack. There’s no word yet on what additional features the Ultra might offer, but Apple might Include new or enhanced hardware features like the M2 Ultra processor or a special ringtone that just says I’m rich and looks at me.
If the rumors are true, the new iPhone Ultra could launch as early as next year, and it’s likely to be popular with Apple’s loyal customer base. However, the higher price may put off some consumers, especially those who already pay top dollar for their existing iPhones role model.
Samsung criticized for bloatware on Galaxy S23 models
Samsung, meanwhile, has come under fire recently for how it handles storage on its Galaxy S23 models. An investigation revealed that 60 bytes of the S23’s base model’s 128 GB of storage were taken up by the system partition, which included bloatware that couldn’t be removed. Although it’s not Uncommon in the world of high-end smartphones Samsung is notorious for preloading its devices with more bloatware than its rivals.
Google’s Pixel offers minimalist approach to software compared to Samsung Galaxy
Google’s Pixel smartphones, on the other hand, are known for their minimalist approach to software, with an Android installation taking up just 15 GB of storage. While Samsung’s One UI offers more features than stock Android, it also takes up more storage space. For consumers who value With more storage, it might be worth considering options other than the Samsung Galaxy.
Microsoft considers using OpenAI tech for natural language processing
In other news, Microsoft, which has invested billions of dollars in OpenAI, is now considering whether to rely on the company’s natural language processing technology, rather than developing its own. A new version of Bing powered by OpenAI’s GPT-3 technology briefly appeared last week, fueling speculation About Microsoft’s future plans for artificial intelligence development.
At the same time, Google announced a new natural language processing model called Bard, which aims to compete with GPT-3. While Bard wasn’t programmed to answer questions in sonnets or write scripts about you in metaphors, it represents an important step in the development of Google’s artificial intelligence.
Google’s Bard aims to compete with GPT-3 in language processing
In general, the world of tech news moves fast, and it’s easy to miss important developments if you’re not kept abreast of the latest happenings. With new products and features constantly being released, it is more important than ever to stay on top of the latest trends and developments in technology industry.
In summary, recent tech news includes rumors of Apple launching a new, more expensive iPhone Ultra, Samsung facing criticism for bloatware on its Galaxy S23 models, and Google’s Pixel offering a minimalist approach to software compared to the Samsung Galaxy. Microsoft is considering relying on OpenAI’s natural language processing technology, while Google announced a new language processing model called Bard to compete with GPT-3. Staying informed about the latest trends and developments is crucial in the fast-moving world of technology.
The ultra model will most likely be a marginal improvement to further inflate their margins by marketing to richer people… Or they will nerf the lower models to artificially increase the perceived value of the higher one. We all know thats how it will go lol.
The main fear I have with putting AI in a search engine is that these AIs are terrible at getting basic facts right. If Google replaces their search engine with a robot that is very good at lying convincingly, they’ll create a whole new wave of richeously misinformed idiots even worse than anything before online.
I would rather them rename the current phones to the M chip name scheme so it’s easier to make sense of the chips too like
“iPhone 15, iPhone 15 pro, iPhone 15 max” instead of pro, pro max, pro max ultra.
What would be interesting would be an M1 based iPhone that you can hook up to a USB-C/Thunderbolt dock and use as a desktop. Or just let us run MacOS X on the M2 iPad Pro… Reduce the number of devices we go carrying around.
There is definitely something up with that review model. My S21 is at 20gb with carrier bloatware and a ton of updates. I highly doubt they’ve tripled the usage of OS+bloatware.
its impossible, but I’d love for the ultra to just have an m1/m2 processor inside it.
EDIT:
For the simple reason that I don’t know what tasks my hardware will eventually be put towards in the future.
In the U.S. the iPhone 14 pro max and Samsung 23 ultra 256gb models are both $1200, so I don’t know why people insist that the iPhones are sooooo much more expensive! Almost all flagship smartphones range between $1,000 and $1,500. Don’t buy them if you don’t like the price! Complaining about pricing is kinda trashy!